| hdworak | as for GSoC projects, are lab updates or a wiki page expected this year? (I think so, based on previous years)? | 00:04 |
|---|---|---|
| *** [mharrison] has joined #cc | 00:05 | |
| *** pdilip has joined #cc | 00:23 | |
| mlinksva | i approved http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/13050#comment-195998 to be mean | 00:29 |
| *** cristi has quit IRC | 00:37 | |
| *** mlinksva has quit IRC | 00:53 | |
| *** MrFacepalm has quit IRC | 00:56 | |
| * hdworak has registered a GSoC account | 01:19 | |
| *** Sertmann has quit IRC | 01:39 | |
| hdworak | bye :) | 01:39 |
| *** hdworak has quit IRC | 01:39 | |
| *** nkinkade has left #cc | 01:46 | |
| *** kreynen has joined #cc | 01:48 | |
| *** [mharrison] has quit IRC | 02:01 | |
| *** [mharrison] has joined #cc | 02:21 | |
| *** kreynen has quit IRC | 02:31 | |
| *** johndoigiii has joined #cc | 02:49 | |
| *** lotia has joined #cc | 03:03 | |
| *** luisv has joined #cc | 03:11 | |
| *** K`Tetch has quit IRC | 03:20 | |
| *** K`Tetch has joined #cc | 03:26 | |
| *** tanjir has joined #cc | 03:44 | |
| *** nik_iitg1 has quit IRC | 03:46 | |
| *** johndoigiii has quit IRC | 03:47 | |
| *** lotia has quit IRC | 03:55 | |
| *** ankitg has quit IRC | 04:02 | |
| *** ankitg has joined #cc | 04:13 | |
| *** ankitg is now known as ankitg_in_class | 04:13 | |
| *** nonoxh has joined #cc | 05:12 | |
| *** nonoxh has quit IRC | 05:15 | |
| *** haoyu has quit IRC | 05:17 | |
| *** haoyu has joined #cc | 05:17 | |
| *** K`Tetch has quit IRC | 05:59 | |
| *** K`Tetch has joined #cc | 06:05 | |
| *** K`Tetch has quit IRC | 06:23 | |
| *** K`Tetch has joined #cc | 06:29 | |
| *** tanjir has quit IRC | 06:47 | |
| *** balor has joined #cc | 06:59 | |
| *** ankitg_in_class has quit IRC | 07:08 | |
| *** K`Tetch has quit IRC | 07:29 | |
| *** K`Tetch has joined #cc | 07:36 | |
| *** ankitg has joined #cc | 07:42 | |
| *** balor has quit IRC | 07:43 | |
| *** sama has joined #cc | 08:07 | |
| *** Orango has joined #cc | 09:07 | |
| *** Steren has joined #cc | 09:35 | |
| *** cristi has joined #cc | 09:41 | |
| *** kittipat has joined #cc | 09:45 | |
| *** JanisB has joined #cc | 10:20 | |
| *** Orango has quit IRC | 10:49 | |
| *** nik_iitg has joined #cc | 10:57 | |
| *** dini has joined #cc | 11:28 | |
| *** kittipat has quit IRC | 11:33 | |
| *** Orango has joined #cc | 12:07 | |
| *** michaelkrnac has joined #cc | 12:32 | |
| *** luisv has quit IRC | 12:37 | |
| *** WishMasterNND has joined #cc | 12:44 | |
| WishMasterNND | Hello there, if I have some photo licenced under CC by-nc-sa v2.0 use a link to v3.0 when using it? | 12:46 |
| *** haoyu has quit IRC | 12:51 | |
| WishMasterNND | Anyone home? | 13:02 |
| *** kreynen has joined #cc | 13:10 | |
| *** haoyu has joined #cc | 13:15 | |
| *** oshani has quit IRC | 13:22 | |
| *** smtms has joined #cc | 13:24 | |
| *** smtms has left #cc | 13:24 | |
| WishMasterNND | This channel seems to be quite sleepy ... | 13:28 |
| *** kittipat has joined #cc | 14:12 | |
| *** lotia has joined #cc | 14:16 | |
| *** jgay has joined #cc | 14:21 | |
| *** kreynen has quit IRC | 14:30 | |
| *** nik_iitg has left #cc | 14:43 | |
| *** michaelkrnac has quit IRC | 14:44 | |
| *** kreynen has joined #cc | 14:49 | |
| *** kittipat has quit IRC | 14:55 | |
| *** kilps has joined #cc | 14:56 | |
| greg-g | WishMasterNND: If it is licensed under CC:BY-NC-SA 2.0 you should link to CC:BY-NC-SA 2.0. | 15:08 |
| *** oshani has joined #cc | 15:11 | |
| *** kilps has left #cc | 15:12 | |
| *** nkinkade has joined #cc | 15:13 | |
| haoyu | which country code standard that CC licenses used? | 15:23 |
| *** Steren has left #cc | 15:30 | |
| greg-g | WishMasterNND: now that I read what you typed in #freeculture: if I were to be picky about it, you should double check which license the photo is under because if it is v1.0 then it CAN NOT be relicensed under any later version unless you are the copyright holder. | 15:42 |
| greg-g | WishMasterNND: the original author should have a link to the license, no? What is the source of the photo? (to give a good answer we usually need more information) | 15:43 |
| *** juanmacuevas has joined #cc | 15:54 | |
| juanmacuevas | hello! | 15:55 |
| juanmacuevas | Is there any mentor of the Google summer of code program? | 15:55 |
| WishMasterNND | greg-g: The photos all are from Flickr. | 15:57 |
| WishMasterNND | greg-g: Unfortunately, I only noted down which type of CC licence they where using. | 15:58 |
| WishMasterNND | greg-g: And up to now I am only crediting the authors by "cc by-something by Author". | 15:58 |
| *** johndoigiii has joined #cc | 16:02 | |
| *** oshani has quit IRC | 16:28 | |
| *** oshani has joined #cc | 16:33 | |
| WishMasterNND | mhm ... it looks like all cc licensed images at Flickr are v2. Is that possible? | 16:37 |
| haoyu | Does CC site have ipv6 support? | 16:38 |
| paulproteus | haoyu, It does not right now. | 16:39 |
| haoyu | ok, thanks paulproteus | 16:41 |
| greg-g | WishMasterNND: well, you *should* link to the original photo | 16:43 |
| greg-g | WishMasterNND: and yes, I believe all CC licenses on Flickr are v2.0 | 16:44 |
| *** mlinksva has joined #cc | 16:51 | |
| WishMasterNND | greg-g: Why link to the original photo? If the author puts his name in his flickr profile I use that, if he doesn't I'll say username/flickr.com. Don't you think that this is appropriate? | 16:57 |
| *** oshani has quit IRC | 16:58 | |
| *** robmyers has joined #cc | 17:01 | |
| *** sama has quit IRC | 17:06 | |
| *** biscazziere2 has joined #cc | 17:07 | |
| biscazziere2 | hi | 17:08 |
| *** juanmacuevas has quit IRC | 17:10 | |
| *** Bovinity has joined #cc | 17:17 | |
| greg-g | WishMasterNND: quoting from a flickr photo page: "Remember! Flickr Community Guidelines specify that if you post a Flickr photo on an external website, the photo must link back to its photo page." | 17:22 |
| greg-g | example: http://www.flickr.com/photos/grggrssmr/3341902493/sizes/l/ | 17:22 |
| greg-g | also, from the CC license legal code: "If You Distribute You must [provide] (i) the name of the Original Author (or pseudonym, if applicable), (ii) the title of the Work if supplied; (iii) to the extent reasonably practicable, the URI, if any, that Licensor specifies to be associated with the Work." | 17:26 |
| greg-g | part (iii) is saying provide a link back to the original, to the extent practical, and providing a link on a webpage is very practical | 17:27 |
| WishMasterNND | greg-g: mhm ... that depends on you CMS, I think. | 17:29 |
| WishMasterNND | Because Imagefield for Drupal doesn't really give me the possibility to add URLs. | 17:30 |
| greg-g | WishMasterNND: providing a link in a caption should not be difficult | 17:32 |
| greg-g | Or, have a list of attributions at the end of the page/post with links there | 17:32 |
| WishMasterNND | Maybe I could do that in the future ... but what about images I already have on the site to whom I don't have the URL anymore? | 17:34 |
| greg-g | WishMasterNND: if I were a lawyer (I'm not) I would say go back and find the originals. But.... | 17:34 |
| greg-g | you said you have the names of the users right? | 17:34 |
| greg-g | you can at least find their user page on Flickr and link to that | 17:34 |
| WishMasterNND | But that would be actually a *huge* lot of work. | 17:36 |
| greg-g | how many images are we talking about? | 17:36 |
| WishMasterNND | Something between 100 and 500, I think. | 17:38 |
| greg-g | unique usernames? | 17:39 |
| greg-g | because this search takes you right to their page if you put in their username: http://www.flickr.com/search/people/ | 17:39 |
| greg-g | WishMasterNND: since we live in a web world, it is really really really really good to link back to the original source, the legal code even says you have to do it. But, the chances of you getting in trouble over it are small. Just, in the future, when you save an image also save the original url for the image so you can properly attribute it. | 17:41 |
| * paulproteus waves | 17:45 | |
| * greg-g waves back | 17:46 | |
| WishMasterNND | greg-g: But then I'd still have to find the photo^^ | 17:46 |
| greg-g | WishMasterNND: I said you could at least link to the user's profile page, which is better than no link. Yes, ideally you would link to the actual photo, but since you seem adverse to doing that amount of work I was suggesting an easier route | 17:47 |
| *** jgay has quit IRC | 17:48 | |
| *** jgay has joined #cc | 17:51 | |
| WishMasterNND | mhm ... I'll try my best. Because I for sure don't want to betray users publishing work under a cc licence. | 17:52 |
| WishMasterNND | Thanks for your advise. | 17:52 |
| greg-g | WishMasterNND: you are welcome, by the way, what are you creating? I'd be curious to see what you're doing with 100-500 images :) | 17:54 |
| WishMasterNND | greg-g: I'm using them on a web magazine created by me and other German students to illustrate our articles. I even wrote an article about Creative Commons last week^^ | 17:56 |
| WishMasterNND | http://dein.gs/2009/03/frei-wie-in-freiheit-die-freie-netzkultur - on the right hand side you can see how we attribute CC photos until now. | 17:57 |
| greg-g | WishMasterNND: interesting. | 18:00 |
| paulproteus | WishMasterNND, You could use a web-based image similarity search engine actually. | 18:01 |
| paulproteus | e.g. http://labs.ideeinc.com/upload/ | 18:03 |
| *** oshani has joined #cc | 18:03 | |
| WishMasterNND | Maybe I should make my subeditors do that^^ | 18:05 |
| paulproteus | If I were you I'd write a script to automate it, given 100-500 photos. | 18:05 |
| WishMasterNND | paulproteus: Your identifying service doesn't appear to work ... I entered an URL and it just doesn't do anything when I click on "get". | 18:07 |
| paulproteus | Oh, well, um, there's probably other ones.... | 18:07 |
| paulproteus | http://tineye.com/ is the one I've actually used. | 18:09 |
| paulproteus | That seems to work. | 18:09 |
| *** oshani has quit IRC | 18:10 | |
| WishMasterNND | But it doesn't find anything for all the images I have tried so far^^ | 18:12 |
| paulproteus | That's a drag. Maybe they don't do a deep crawl of Flickr. | 18:23 |
| *** johndoigiii has quit IRC | 18:33 | |
| *** johndoigiii has joined #cc | 18:34 | |
| *** oshani has joined #cc | 18:58 | |
| *** ankitg has quit IRC | 19:14 | |
| *** ankitg has joined #cc | 19:14 | |
| cristi | hello everyone | 19:18 |
| cristi | does sombody know how many applications were sent for cc? | 19:19 |
| *** WishMasterNND has quit IRC | 19:20 | |
| JanisB | cristi, wait for nathany, like me :) | 19:22 |
| cristi | ok :) | 19:22 |
| Bovinity | nathany is out of the office today | 19:35 |
| Bovinity | check back on monday | 19:35 |
| *** Steren has joined #cc | 19:45 | |
| *** Steren has left #cc | 19:45 | |
| *** oshani has left #cc | 19:49 | |
| *** geniice has joined #cc | 20:03 | |
| geniice | do we have anyone in leicestershire? | 20:03 |
| robmyers | I'm in cambridgeshire | 20:06 |
| robmyers | assuming we are talking uk counties ;-) | 20:06 |
| geniice | yeah | 20:07 |
| nkinkade | paulproteus: Should git rebase --onto work just fine for the git-cvs stuff with Drupal. | 20:07 |
| nkinkade | ? | 20:07 |
| nkinkade | I just tried and it failed. | 20:08 |
| nkinkade | But maybe I did something wrong, or the repository isn't right. | 20:08 |
| geniice | anyway the county council is proposeing to scan about 10K lantern slides | 20:08 |
| robmyers | you're in leics.? kewl | 20:08 |
| geniice | but they are trying to keep hold of the rights. | 20:08 |
| geniice | anyone want to try talking to them about that? | 20:08 |
| robmyers | erk | 20:08 |
| robmyers | well unfortunately under uk law there is a *very* low threshold for originality | 20:09 |
| robmyers | so they are within their rights to keep the rights ;-( | 20:09 |
| geniice | Plently of time they haven't employed anyone to do the scanning yet | 20:09 |
| robmyers | what are the slides of? | 20:09 |
| robmyers | are they photographic or are they drawings? | 20:09 |
| robmyers | i.e. are hey of local scenes or of fantasy scenes | 20:10 |
| robmyers | they | 20:10 |
| robmyers | the people to contact in the uk would be ORG (openrightsgroup.org) and okfn (okfn.org) | 20:10 |
| geniice | don't know all I know is that they are held in the records office | 20:10 |
| robmyers | sure | 20:11 |
| robmyers | is there a web page or news item for the proposal? | 20:11 |
| geniice | no | 20:11 |
| geniice | but check out page 8 of http://www.leicestershire.gov.uk/298_cs679_photo_digitiation__access_project_worker_cs679-2.pdf | 20:12 |
| robmyers | (reading...) | 20:13 |
| *** staminna has joined #cc | 20:13 | |
| robmyers | yeah magic lantern probably means old photographic slides | 20:14 |
| geniice | yes | 20:14 |
| robmyers | I have a load of old ones from london | 20:14 |
| robmyers | OK | 20:14 |
| geniice | hmm not something I collect since I don't have the kit for scanning them | 20:15 |
| robmyers | you could probably scan them with a flatbed scanner. they're great fun. | 20:15 |
| robmyers | I suggest you email me (rob at robmyers dot org) and I can forward you to people and groups that may be able to help | 20:15 |
| robmyers | local to the uk | 20:16 |
| geniice | uh huh | 20:16 |
| robmyers | maybe wikimedia uk as well | 20:16 |
| geniice | yeah I was going to poke them at some point | 20:16 |
| robmyers | cool | 20:17 |
| robmyers | email me the details you've mentioned here and I can forward them & you to okfn, org, wikimedia and others. or take this as suggestions for people to contact ;-) | 20:17 |
| robmyers | it would be good to cc the images as that will give them to the council tax payers and publicise the area | 20:18 |
| robmyers | british photographic copyright is too strong 8-( | 20:18 |
| robmyers | tom chance would be good as well, he's done work on local government and free culture | 20:21 |
| robmyers | and for examples there's "wikipedia loves art" at the v&a and the "flickr commons" in the US | 20:22 |
| robmyers | mlinksva are you around? | 20:24 |
| robmyers | any other suggestions for people/groups in the UK to try to persuade a state government organization to cc licence some historic photographs? | 20:25 |
| geniice | robmyers did you look at their mission statement? | 20:25 |
| robmyers | yes; opportunities to learn, free net access at libraries | 20:27 |
| robmyers | ? | 20:27 |
| geniice | Developing community involvement in all our schemes, facilities and events through | 20:27 |
| geniice | community outreach work, grants and practical support. | 20:27 |
| robmyers | yes | 20:28 |
| geniice | Preserving our heritage and *helping the public to understand and appreciate it.* | 20:28 |
| robmyers | sounds like a perfect match for cc | 20:28 |
| geniice | If we can convice them of that yes | 20:29 |
| *** oshani has joined #cc | 20:30 | |
| geniice | I remeber once talking about some of this stuff with my local libiary service. after asking if I could release scans I paid for under the GFDL I got back the responce I could use them on my website. I gave up at that point | 20:30 |
| *** oshani_ has joined #cc | 20:33 | |
| *** oshani has quit IRC | 20:35 | |
| *** staminna has quit IRC | 20:42 | |
| robmyers | ok I have added this to my "action required" list and will take a look tomorrow. people will be out of the office until monday though probably | 20:44 |
| robmyers | he won't love me for this but do email mlinksva and see if he can suggest anyone or any examples ;-) | 20:45 |
| robmyers | ok see you later... | 20:48 |
| *** robmyers has quit IRC | 20:49 | |
| mlinksva | well looks like i missed robmyers. anyway reading back the orgs (including the ORG) he suggested would be my first guesses too. | 20:57 |
| mlinksva | there's also the looking rather low traffic http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-uk/ list that could be worth pinging for other leads | 20:57 |
| geniice | well obviously my wikimedia-uk and wikipedia links are my stongest but WMUK isn't fully functional yet | 20:58 |
| paulproteus | nkinkade, It should work fine. | 21:04 |
| paulproteus | Show me? | 21:04 |
| paulproteus | I used to be in Leicestershire! | 21:04 |
| nkinkade | paulproteus: I'll send an email about it. | 21:04 |
| geniice | http://www.leicestershire.gov.uk/298_cs679_photo_digitiation__access_project_worker_cs679-2.pdf page 8 | 21:05 |
| paulproteus | nkinkade, Great | 21:08 |
| *** Orango has quit IRC | 21:17 | |
| *** jgay_ has joined #cc | 21:18 | |
| *** hdworak has joined #cc | 21:22 | |
| hdworak | hi | 21:23 |
| hdworak | paulproteus: I had an unexpected circumstances that had caused me not to submit the application to GSoC on time. I'm sorry about that. I can see that contrary to the previous year the deadline has not been extended. Thanks for your time. | 21:25 |
| *** hdworak has quit IRC | 21:26 | |
| paulproteus | Aw well. | 21:27 |
| paulproteus | He didn't have to just disappear like that, but oh well. | 21:27 |
| paulproteus | nkinkade, Thanks - feel free to be relatively terse in that email about git stuff. | 21:28 |
| *** tp2009 has joined #cc | 21:31 | |
| tp2009 | hello | 21:32 |
| *** jgay has quit IRC | 21:34 | |
| *** dini has quit IRC | 21:41 | |
| *** dini has joined #cc | 21:43 | |
| *** oshani_ has left #cc | 21:52 | |
| *** JanisB has quit IRC | 21:58 | |
| tp2009 | [x] -=o=- -=o=- [x] | 22:04 |
| paulproteus | Bovinity, link? re: redesign stuff | 22:06 |
| Bovinity | http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryanjunell/sets/72157615954652644/ | 22:06 |
| *** biscazziere2 has quit IRC | 22:12 | |
| paulproteus | nkinkade, Around on IRC for git chatter? | 22:12 |
| nkinkade | paulproteus: Yeah. | 22:13 |
| paulproteus | If you look in gitk on cc_staging, you'll see there's a merge in the past. | 22:13 |
| paulproteus | What rebase is designed for is transplanting *linear* history. | 22:14 |
| nkinkade | Is that the red arrow pointing down? | 22:14 |
| paulproteus | Ya. | 22:14 |
| nkinkade | Ah. | 22:14 |
| paulproteus | But really it's evidenced by the fact that c52f6f806118948a7594ca0dfe554d5f5d3286ea ("An upgrade to Drupal 6.9") has two parents. | 22:15 |
| nkinkade | So what is the upgrade path for Drupal? Should I make a clean branch then readd all my commits? | 22:15 |
| paulproteus | There's linear history from that commit on. So just tell git-rebase that you're based on c52f6f806118948a7594ca0dfe554d5f5d3286ea ("An upgrade to Drupal 6.9" by you) rather than one of goba's commits. | 22:15 |
| paulproteus | Note that I haven't tried this yet; I can if you want, but I think it'll work so I'm pretty happy just telling you to do it (so long as you see what I mean). | 22:16 |
| nkinkade | paulproteus: I have already tried that. | 22:16 |
| paulproteus | Oh, interesting! | 22:16 |
| paulproteus | I'll give this a shot then. | 22:16 |
| nkinkade | It failed even worse. | 22:16 |
| paulproteus | Lemme see. | 22:16 |
| nkinkade | That is rather than the 1 conflict the other gave me, that method gave me about 10 or 15. | 22:16 |
| nkinkade | Is it possible to just make a totally clean branch on for 6.10, and the somehow apply all the commits made by me since 6.9? | 22:18 |
| paulproteus | One sec, let me read the git docs. | 22:20 |
| paulproteus | $ git format-patch -C c52f6f806118948a7594ca0dfe554d5f5d3286ea..6b637d7d84ac224467afd142ee80e35f16defdc1 | 22:22 |
| paulproteus | That outputs one text file per patch. | 22:22 |
| paulproteus | $ git checkout -b new_staging DRUPAL-6-10 | 22:22 |
| paulproteus | Er, this is failing because the first patch depends on stuff before the merge. | 22:23 |
| paulproteus | And the "stuff before the merge" in the end starts at "Initial commit of the CC drupal install." | 22:25 |
| paulproteus | Given that our cc_staging branch isn't actually rooted at a Drupal revision, I'd say we ought to just make it fresh for sanity's sake. | 22:26 |
| paulproteus | nkinkade, SYN | 22:27 |
| nkinkade | paulproteus: So I should do fresh branch, then use the format-patch to get my commits? | 22:28 |
| paulproteus | With the caveat that most won't even apply. )-: | 22:28 |
| nkinkade | Or you're saying some of those commits will fail because they depend on stuff that wont' be there. | 22:29 |
| paulproteus | Right-o. | 22:29 |
| nkinkade | That sucks. | 22:29 |
| paulproteus | There's a slight way forward. | 22:29 |
| nkinkade | I guess that's a result of our previous merge, as you said. | 22:29 |
| paulproteus | Which is to first create a patch that shows the diff between the "root" commit (34426e5f9c44bfc5a6dabf16188a9589deb2ac7d) and the Drupal version it was based on. | 22:29 |
| paulproteus | The most pressing problem isn't the merge, it's the fact that we're not rooted at any Drupal version at all! | 22:30 |
| paulproteus | (All because I thought I could outsmart the VCS a year ago. Sorry about that.) | 22:30 |
| nkinkade | There is no official tag, or branch that I can see for Drupal. 6.10 is buried as a commit inside or origin/DRUPAL-6 | 22:30 |
| paulproteus | Right, sure. But if you go down on the left in cc_staging to the bottom, you'll see the root of our work is no Drupal commit at all. (Do you see what I mean by that?) | 22:31 |
| nkinkade | I'll just start fresh with that stuff. It won't take too too long to get all those modules in there again. | 22:31 |
| paulproteus | Yeah, and this time, there's a sane path forward. | 22:31 |
| nkinkade | I bother trying to scroll way down to see where things got messed up. | 22:32 |
| nkinkade | *didn't bother | 22:32 |
| paulproteus | I'd say you should, to see what I mean. | 22:32 |
| paulproteus | It's actually pretty easy if you click "parent" links rather than scroll forever. | 22:33 |
| nkinkade | That doesn't help at all, the visualization of what was going on is absurb down around 650755addba5f8b7e8ba9720f0030497e1b50413 | 22:35 |
| nkinkade | Lots of colors, lots of arrow going in every direction, and no sense that I can make of it at the moment. | 22:36 |
| paulproteus | Lemme see | 22:36 |
| paulproteus | nkinkade, Right, okay, there. | 22:38 |
| paulproteus | So click the bottom tip of the red arrow there. | 22:38 |
| paulproteus | And you get to "Add a .gitignore" by me (08c4a6cdbdd6597e6e528794688bee40ea045298) which has 34426e5f9c44bfc5a6dabf16188a9589deb2ac7d (you, "Initial commit of the CC ...") as its parent. | 22:39 |
| paulproteus | And that's all. | 22:39 |
| paulproteus | Do you see that now? | 22:39 |
| paulproteus | If so, you'll agree that the "Initial commit" doesn't have a Drupal version as its parent at all. So there's no sensible Drupal version that can be passed in to git-rebase as the "onto". | 22:39 |
| nkinkade | I see that now. I was confused because you said "red arrow" but it was the blue arrow tip I needed to click. | 22:42 |
| paulproteus | Oh, sorry about that. Maybe I added a local branch that changed my colors. | 22:42 |
| nkinkade | Ah, that makes sense. | 22:42 |
| paulproteus | I mention all this to point out this crucial fact: There is no Drupal version in the tree that you can just transplant your patches as being onto. | 22:42 |
| nkinkade | So in any case, I can see that it's a total caos as is. | 22:42 |
| nkinkade | Well be better off to spend some time just redoing this right. | 22:43 |
| paulproteus | *Unless* you fabricate one by doing a diff between the "Initial commit..." rev and the rev of the corresponding Drupal version. | 22:43 |
| nkinkade | .... next week. :-) | 22:43 |
| paulproteus | I agree. Sorry to have brought you to this mess, but I hope when we climb out of it we'll decide that we're in a reasonable place. | 22:43 |
| paulproteus | Good thinking there. (-: | 22:43 |
| nkinkade | No problem. We don't really have any changes ... just config files and modules. | 22:43 |
| nkinkade | ... as far as I know. | 22:43 |
| paulproteus | ... (-: | 22:44 |
| nkinkade | :-) | 22:44 |
| nkinkade | Dualing smileys. | 22:44 |
| nkinkade | :-)(-: | 22:44 |
| *** tp2009 has quit IRC | 22:47 | |
| paulproteus | *tp2009 has quit (Read error: Connection reset by FBI) | 22:51 |
| *** kreynen has quit IRC | 23:13 | |
| *** kreynen has joined #cc | 23:33 | |
| *** lotia_ has joined #cc | 23:39 | |
| *** lotia has quit IRC | 23:42 | |
| mlinksva | greg-g: did you get anywhere on a copyfraud faq item? np if not, just checking. DP said she would just write if we don't ahve anything, and that making a policy statment on it is a good thing | 23:53 |
| papyromancer | nkinkade: Siamese Cat | 23:58 |
| papyromancer | (-:-) | 23:58 |
| nkinkade | :-) | 23:59 |
| nkinkade | :) | 23:59 |
| nkinkade | (-: | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.6 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!