| *** NotADJ has joined #cc | 00:13 | |
| *** inty_pinty has joined #cc | 00:31 | |
| *** inty_pinty has left #cc | 00:31 | |
| *** Roderick__ has quit IRC | 02:24 | |
| *** adjohn has joined #cc | 02:51 | |
| *** ds has joined #cc | 03:12 | |
| ds | mecredis: you around? | 03:33 |
|---|---|---|
| *** adjohn_ has joined #cc | 03:44 | |
| *** adjohn has quit IRC | 03:53 | |
| *** adjohn__ has joined #cc | 05:14 | |
| *** adjohn_ has quit IRC | 05:14 | |
| mecredis | ds: for the next 10 seconds | 05:24 |
| mecredis | whats up? | 05:24 |
| mecredis | how is dirac? | 05:24 |
| *** adjohn_ has joined #cc | 05:57 | |
| *** adjohn__ has quit IRC | 06:15 | |
| *** adamorjames_ has joined #cc | 06:18 | |
| *** adamorjames has quit IRC | 06:18 | |
| *** isforinsects has quit IRC | 07:43 | |
| *** isforinsects has joined #cc | 07:45 | |
| *** jgay has joined #cc | 08:11 | |
| *** balor has joined #cc | 09:08 | |
| *** Roderick_ has joined #CC | 10:00 | |
| *** sama has joined #cc | 10:22 | |
| *** parkerhiggins has joined #cc | 10:32 | |
| *** jgay has quit IRC | 10:55 | |
| *** adamorjames_ is now known as adamorjames | 12:59 | |
| *** rohitj has quit IRC | 13:39 | |
| *** Roderick_ has quit IRC | 13:41 | |
| *** sama_ has joined #cc | 14:05 | |
| *** tvol has joined #CC | 14:08 | |
| *** sama has quit IRC | 14:20 | |
| *** sama__ has joined #cc | 14:20 | |
| *** isforinsects has quit IRC | 14:32 | |
| *** is4 has joined #cc | 14:35 | |
| *** sama_ has quit IRC | 14:36 | |
| *** stevel has joined #cc | 14:36 | |
| *** balor has quit IRC | 14:50 | |
| *** sama__ is now known as sama | 14:58 | |
| *** nathany has joined #cc | 15:43 | |
| *** adjohn_ has quit IRC | 15:51 | |
| *** nkinkade has joined #cc | 16:06 | |
| *** nathany_ has joined #cc | 16:13 | |
| *** sama has quit IRC | 16:17 | |
| *** stevel has quit IRC | 16:20 | |
| *** stevel has joined #cc | 16:26 | |
| *** nathany has quit IRC | 16:27 | |
| *** nathany__ has joined #cc | 16:34 | |
| *** nathany has joined #cc | 16:40 | |
| *** nathany__ has quit IRC | 16:42 | |
| *** nathany_ has quit IRC | 16:42 | |
| *** nathany has quit IRC | 16:49 | |
| *** nathany has joined #cc | 16:50 | |
| *** balor has joined #cc | 16:53 | |
| paulproteus | nathany, Morning. | 17:27 |
| paulproteus | nathany, See you in the office a shade after 10. | 17:27 |
| nathany | great | 17:27 |
| *** mlinksva has joined #cc | 17:29 | |
| *** sama has joined #cc | 17:45 | |
| *** mlinksva has quit IRC | 18:21 | |
| nkinkade | nathany: Would you have any issue with me merging the CSS based NC icon changes to production? | 18:26 |
| nkinkade | Is cc.engine using svnmerge? | 18:27 |
| nathany | no issues (esp since you'll still need to re-gen before it's "really" live) | 18:27 |
| nathany | and yes, it's using svnmerge | 18:27 |
| nkinkade | Perfect. | 18:27 |
| paulproteus | nathany, When you have a sec, let's sync(). | 18:40 |
| nathany | ok, one second | 18:40 |
| nkinkade | nathany: Do you know of any reason why svnmerge avail wouldn't know about new commits to trunk for cc.engine? | 18:58 |
| nkinkade | I can try to dig for it, but figured you might have some quick suggestions. | 18:58 |
| nathany | nkinkade: nope... unless it thinks they're already merged? | 19:13 |
| nathany | nkinkade: you can look at the svn properties that svnmerge uses and see if those revs are included | 19:13 |
| nkinkade | nathany: Well, svnmerge integrated doesn't reveal anything interesting either. | 19:13 |
| nathany | it doesn't show those revs as being integrated? | 19:14 |
| nkinkade | In fact, svnmerge integrated seems to not jive with svn log. | 19:15 |
| nathany | (i'm updating now to see what it shows for me) | 19:15 |
| nkinkade | On my checkout of production svnmerge integrated says only 8439-8722, yet I can look through the svn logs and see places where other things were merged. | 19:16 |
| paulproteus | BTW, you all should stop using svnmerge.py and start using svn 1.5's built-in merge support. | 19:20 |
| paulproteus | Since they're the same, but the latter is better-supported. | 19:20 |
| paulproteus | nathany, cchost in /var/www/translate.creativecommons.org/po/cchost is not a checkout of anything, svn or otherwise. | 19:35 |
| paulproteus | I should make the Mozootle one a checkout...? | 19:35 |
| nathany | paulproteus: yes | 19:36 |
| paulproteus | Great. | 19:36 |
| nathany | nkinkade: looks like production thinks it's merging from the labs branch for some reason | 19:37 |
| nathany | that explains why the integrated revs are bogus | 19:37 |
| nathany | probably worth looking back through history to see where that went amiss (since props are versioned) | 19:37 |
| paulproteus | I thought props aren't versioned. | 19:39 |
| paulproteus | They're just changeable. | 19:39 |
| paulproteus | Maybe I'm on crack, it's hard to tell sometimes. | 19:39 |
| paulproteus | Oh, it's *revision* properties that aren't versioned, I think. | 19:40 |
| paulproteus | But file properties, sure. | 19:40 |
| *** K`Tetch_ has quit IRC | 19:40 | |
| *** K`Tetch has joined #cc | 19:43 | |
| paulproteus | nathany: a7:/var/www/translate.creativecommons.org/po/ccpublisher# svn info | 19:46 |
| paulproteus | Path: . | 19:46 |
| paulproteus | URL: https://svn.berlios.de/svnroot/repos/cctools/publisher/trunk/resources/locale | 19:46 |
| paulproteus | Is this still the right place for ccpublisher? | 19:47 |
| nathany | paulproteus: as right as we get right now, yes | 19:47 |
| paulproteus | Great. | 19:47 |
| paulproteus | (Any reason not to svnadmin dump that into code-dot?) | 19:48 |
| paulproteus | (And then close up shop in Berlios?) | 19:48 |
| *** is4 has quit IRC | 19:53 | |
| *** is4 has joined #cc | 20:08 | |
| *** mlinksva has joined #cc | 20:09 | |
| mecredis | heh. yousendit is down | 20:11 |
| mecredis | http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/yousendit.com | 20:11 |
| paulproteus | Don't you have servers of your own you can upload files to? | 20:13 |
| paulproteus | Or of CC's? (-: | 20:13 |
| mecredis | just someone's link to something | 20:21 |
| mecredis | isn't working | 20:21 |
| mecredis | not a cc problem, as it were | 20:21 |
| *** adamorjames has quit IRC | 20:28 | |
| nkinkade | nathany: Was paulproteus right? If not, how does one go about viewing property revision history? | 20:34 |
| nkinkade | Seems that propget will accept a revision number argument, but that's going to be tedious. | 20:43 |
| nkinkade | nathany: It seems to have somehow occurred on your commit 10727. | 20:48 |
| *** balor has quit IRC | 20:53 | |
| nkinkade | Or actually revision 10729. | 21:05 |
| nkinkade | nathany: Is the best thing in this case to just take the last known good value of svnmerge-integrated and then do a propset on it with that value? | 21:05 |
| *** Roderick_ has joined #CC | 21:09 | |
| nathany | nkinkade: yeah, that's probably reasonable -- not sure what you're asking about wrt paulproteus | 21:16 |
| paulproteus | No worries wrt what nkinkade was asking wrt me. | 21:16 |
| nkinkade | paulproteus made some mention about properties not being revisioned, then questioned himself, then seemingly corrected himself, but it wasn't clearr to me. | 21:16 |
| *** is4 has quit IRC | 21:17 | |
| paulproteus | I agree that that's what I did. | 21:24 |
| *** sama has quit IRC | 21:24 | |
| *** adjohn has joined #cc | 21:39 | |
| *** pjkh has joined #cc | 21:42 | |
| pjkh | anyone up for a quick question about attributing an image? I'm trying to find guidelines on where the attribution should go -- that is, would it be okay to put the attribution in the footer of the site or does it need to "go with the image"? | 21:43 |
| paulproteus | In the footer of the site should be fine. | 21:44 |
| paulproteus | I'm not a lawyer, blah blah. | 21:44 |
| pjkh | :) figure that's better than nothing. just don't have much room near the image to do it. | 21:44 |
| pjkh | thanks paulproteus | 21:44 |
| paulproteus | The FAQ answers this a bit. | 21:44 |
| paulproteus | But it points out that you should put attribution wherever you normally put credits on the site/film/etc. | 21:45 |
| pjkh | ah. gotcha. thanks | 21:45 |
| *** is4 has joined #cc | 21:47 | |
| paulproteus | nathany, /me continues to borrow your headphones | 21:55 |
| nathany | uh, ok | 21:55 |
| nkinkade | nathany: When adding a new language. Is it necessary to manually change or commit anything to the CC-style po files? | 21:59 |
| nkinkade | I don't recall having had to do that in the past. | 21:59 |
| nathany | nkinkade: you'll have to once they do the translation | 21:59 |
| nkinkade | But now cc2po is throwing an error, complaining that i18n/en_SG doesn't exist. | 22:00 |
| nkinkade | When I did en_HK I don't recall having had to touch anything in i18n. | 22:00 |
| nkinkade | nathany: en_SG is just a copy of en_GB, so it's nearly complete. | 22:01 |
| nathany | i guess it sounds like you need to create the directory at least | 22:01 |
| nkinkade | Hmm. I pretty sure I didn't do that with en_HK, but oh well, I'll try to manually make the dir. | 22:02 |
| nathany | respectfully, you were sort of cracked out on cold medicine (or at least with a cold) during HK deployment :) | 22:02 |
| nkinkade | Change that ... i18n/en_SG exists, the script is complaining that cc_org.po doesn't exist in that dir. | 22:03 |
| nathany | wait, you're running cc2po | 22:03 |
| nathany | and it's complaining that i18n/en_SG/cc_org.po doesn't exist? | 22:03 |
| nathany | that actually sounds sane to me -- isn't that where it looks for the CC style po files? | 22:04 |
| nkinkade | No, sorry, I meant po2cc | 22:04 |
| nkinkade | nathany: ^^, and i was running po2cc, I just typed it wrong above. | 22:05 |
| nathany | ah | 22:05 |
| nathany | still semi-sane | 22:05 |
| *** pjkh has left #cc | 22:05 | |
| nkinkade | I just touched the po file. | 22:05 |
| nkinkade | Then it ran fine. | 22:05 |
| nathany | it looks for the old version to make comparisons and figure out if the english has changed | 22:05 |
| nathany | right | 22:05 |
| nkinkade | The main reason I asked was that I didnt' recall doing that for en_HK, but I was in haze at that time from that cold. | 22:06 |
| nathany | :) | 22:06 |
| *** Bovinity has joined #cc | 22:14 | |
| Bovinity | that'll teach me to have my laptop crash at the weekend. oh hai irc. | 22:15 |
| nkinkade | Bovinity: It's unforgivable. Don't let it happen again. | 22:24 |
| *** Roderick_ has quit IRC | 22:29 | |
| *** Roderick_ has joined #CC | 22:31 | |
| *** parkerhiggins has quit IRC | 23:12 | |
| *** tvol has quit IRC | 23:15 | |
| nkinkade | nathany: Have you seen this error before in mkdeeds: DocTestFailureException: Failed doctest test for mkdeeds.txt | 23:18 |
| nathany | nkinkade: i've probably seen it | 23:19 |
| nathany | it's the most generic error you could get -- basically *something* went wrong | 23:19 |
| nathany | is there a traceback? | 23:19 |
| nkinkade | There is, but it's not any clearer to me. I'll pastebin it. | 23:20 |
| nkinkade | nathany: The ultimate error is: httperror_seek_wrapper: HTTP Error 500: Internal Server Error | 23:20 |
| nkinkade | But that seemed even more vague to me than the first I posted. | 23:20 |
| nathany | that means something's throwing an error when it tries to render the deed | 23:21 |
| nathany | i'd try to run it in the foreground (./bin/cc-engine fg) | 23:21 |
| nkinkade | Ah, yes. | 23:21 |
| nathany | and try to access the deeds for the new jurisdiction you've added | 23:21 |
| nkinkade | I'll try that: http://cc.pastebin.com/m5d0200c7 | 23:21 |
| nkinkade | For what it's worth. | 23:22 |
| nathany | yeah, not very specific | 23:22 |
| nkinkade | I'll do the fg bit and see what I get. | 23:22 |
| nathany | that should make the licenses available at http://localhost:8080/licenses/ | 23:23 |
| nkinkade | Port 9080. :-) | 23:27 |
| nkinkade | nathany: It seems to be choking on something to do with jurisdictions.css. | 23:28 |
| *** tvol has joined #CC | 23:29 | |
| nkinkade | TraversalError: (<zope.app.publisher.browser.directoryresource.DirectoryResource object at 0xb21b68c>, 'jurisdictions.css') | 23:29 |
| nathany | is jurisdictions.css really in svn and getting pulled into cc/engine/skins/resources/ ... ? | 23:29 |
| nkinkade | nathany: Right, it's not there. | 23:30 |
| nkinkade | Sadly, but it will be in a moment. :-) | 23:30 |
| nathany | :) | 23:31 |
| nkinkade | Okay, the foreground bit for deed generation is something I had seen, but forgot about. I'll drop that one into my tool belt not to forget again. | 23:31 |
| nathany | it shoudl be enough to just "touch" it -- the resource machinery just makes sure it exists | 23:31 |
| nathany | :) | 23:31 |
| nkinkade | I guess I'll go ahead and merge it in, just to be done with it. | 23:34 |
| mlinksva | if you have a /. acct http://slashdot.org/firehose.pl?op=view&id=1740613 | 23:35 |
| paulproteus | nathany, In the future of Pootle permissions, shouldn't we just give language admins equal access to all projects? | 23:36 |
| paulproteus | Feel free to not answer; I think you'll see the sense of that once I have that report you asked for. (-: | 23:36 |
| nathany | paulproteus: the only counter-argument that comes to mind is that we may wish to be more liberal with who gets commit/admin access for things other than cc.org | 23:37 |
| *** is4 has quit IRC | 23:37 | |
| paulproteus | Yeah, that's what I was thinking. | 23:37 |
| nkinkade | Bovinity: Where is the intersection between the ccwordpress/branches/production/www/includes and the git repository? | 23:46 |
| Bovinity | nkinkade: www/includes has some svn:externals | 23:46 |
| Bovinity | afaik, no git content | 23:46 |
| nkinkade | Bovinity: Sorry. I was thinking of two totally different things. | 23:47 |
| Bovinity | nkinkade: apparently | 23:47 |
| * nkinkade goes to get his shit together. | 23:48 | |
| Bovinity | shit be all over the place today, it seems. | 23:48 |
| *** rohitj has joined #cc | 23:57 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.6 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!