Monday, 2006-12-18

*** paulproteus has quit IRC03:18
*** paulproteus has joined #cc03:31
WillySillyhi paulproteus03:34
*** dorileo has joined #cc04:38
*** rolandalton has joined #CC06:37
*** rolandalton has quit IRC07:07
*** rolandalton has joined #CC07:32
*** rolandalton has quit IRC07:56
*** sama has joined #cc08:19
*** paulproteus has quit IRC09:03
*** kristallpirat has joined #cc09:29
*** rolandalton has joined #CC10:31
*** dorileo has quit IRC11:13
*** kvossen has joined #cc11:32
*** kvossen has left #cc11:34
*** rolandalton has quit IRC11:59
*** rolandalton has joined #CC12:19
*** nuku_ has joined #cc12:27
*** sama_ has joined #cc12:38
*** sama has quit IRC12:38
*** nuku has quit IRC12:40
*** sama_ is now known as sama12:40
*** kristallpirat has quit IRC12:53
*** dorileo has joined #cc13:05
*** nuku_ has left #cc13:59
*** rolandalton has quit IRC14:53
*** paulproteus has joined #cc15:16
*** sciboy has joined #cc15:47
*** kristallpirat has joined #cc15:53
*** sciboy has quit IRC15:59
*** rolandalton has joined #CC16:18
*** sama has quit IRC16:22
*** sama has joined #cc16:37
*** sama has quit IRC16:41
*** kristallpirat has quit IRC17:27
*** kristallpirat has joined #cc17:57
*** sama has joined #cc17:59
*** bovinity has joined #cc18:06
*** mcdonaldswes has joined #cc19:44
*** sama has quit IRC19:56
*** rolandalton has quit IRC20:11
cchelpbotNew news from http://creativecommons.org/weblog/rss: CC Changes <http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/7158>20:13
*** dpkp has joined #cc20:41
mcdonaldswesI have a question about the ShareAlike 2.5 license.. I've put a script under this license, and I was wondering if the performance of the script counts as a derivative work21:26
mcdonaldswesif it does, how do the performers ensure that the performance is also shareable?21:26
dpkpby performance, you mean the results of executing the script?21:30
mcdonaldswesyes21:30
dpkp"performance" in copyright parlance has a different meaning, so it can be confusing21:31
mcdonaldswesah ok.. my second question then is what "performance" in copyright parlance is :)  but first, does the result of executing the script count as a transformation of the work?21:33
dpkpi'm no lawyer, but my first stab is no21:34
dpkpthe GPL, for example, is used quite extensively in web scripts21:35
dpkpbut it is widely understood to not apply to the output of those scripts, only the source code itself and modifcations to the source code21:35
dpkpCC licenses, though, were not designed with source code in mind21:36
mcdonaldswesperformances and program output are considered different beasts, though.. I don't think people tend to claim that the output of a program has a license that's somehow related the the license of the program itself21:38
mcdonaldsweslike word processors, for instance21:38
mcdonaldswesbut in the case of artistic performances, whether or not you can create the output does depend on the license of the "source"21:39
bovinityexcept CC licenses were indeed not designed for source -- full apps or scripts, so the language and usage will not directly apply21:41
bovinitybut there are open source licenses that compliment cc ones21:41
bovinitythere is the CC-GPL if you want to keep it int he family, but ianal and have no idea how the cc-gpl is different to the regular gpl21:42
mcdonaldsweshm, actually, I'm reading the legalese of the license more closely now and they have special clauses for public display and performances of the work21:44
mcdonaldswes4b and 4c21:44
dpkp"public performance" and "public display" are explicit rights granted under the US copyright statute21:45
dpkpso is the right to permit "derivatives"21:45
dpkpwhich is why I said your initial question is a little confusing21:45
mcdonaldswesgotcha21:46
bovinityand theoretically, a derivative work of a script or code is another script/code based upon it. again, ianal.21:47
dpkpright21:47
dpkpalthough, I'm not actually sure that executing a piece of code would be considered a "performance"21:48
mcdonaldswesok, and to clarify another point.. if I perform the work myself, do I also have to put a recording of that performance under the ShareAlike license?21:48
mcdonaldswesoh, hahaha21:49
mcdonaldswesI totally missed this earlier..21:49
mcdonaldswesby "script", I meant a written dialogue21:49
bovinityoh, lol21:49
dpkpahhh21:49
dpkpwe're such hacker geeks21:49
mcdonaldswesI was a little confused as to why you were talking about the GPL, but I thought it was to make an analogy21:49
bovinityhelp to clarify :)21:49
bovinitythat's what you get when you talk to coders, heh21:49
mcdonaldswesI should have realized :)21:50
dpkpso what SA means is that any downstream copyrightable work (ie. a derivative) must be shared under the same terms21:50
dpkpto be copyrightable, a work must be fixed in a tangible medium21:51
mcdonaldswesok, so any non-recorded performance of the work doesn't apply then21:51
dpkpexactly21:51
dpkpif it is recorded, the recording becomes a derivative work21:51
dpkpbut the performance itself is not21:51
mcdonaldswesnow, what if I record the performance myself? do I have to put the recording under SA?21:51
dpkpas the copyright holder, you are not bound by you CC license21:52
dpkper, your21:52
mcdonaldswesok, that's what I thought21:52
dpkpso you can license and relicense however you choose - hooray!21:52
mcdonaldswes:)21:53
*** Friedemann has joined #cc22:02
*** surfbuddy has joined #cc22:02
*** surfbuddy has left #cc22:03
*** Friedemann has left #cc22:03
*** Friedemann has joined #cc22:04
*** dorileo has quit IRC22:10
*** kristallpirat has quit IRC22:23
*** __shawn has quit IRC22:27
*** dpkp has quit IRC22:59
*** bovinity has quit IRC23:09
*** bovinity has joined #cc23:10
*** __shawn has joined #cc23:11

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!