Friday, 2006-02-24

*** mcmay has quit IRC00:08
*** raf256[laptop] has joined #cc00:48
*** raf256[laptop] has left #cc00:49
*** hober has quit IRC00:58
*** KevinMarks has quit IRC01:21
*** tannewt has joined #cc01:48
cchelpbotNew news from http://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/index.php?title=special:recentchanges&feed=rss: ODRL <http://wiki.creativecommons.org/ODRL>01:52
*** mcmay_ has quit IRC02:02
*** mlinksva has quit IRC02:19
*** tannewt has quit IRC02:19
*** ginger has joined #cc02:50
*** mcmay has joined #cc03:01
*** mcmay has quit IRC03:03
*** KevinMarks has joined #cc03:15
*** mlinksva has joined #cc03:56
*** hober has joined #cc04:11
*** kfish has quit IRC05:07
*** ginger has quit IRC05:27
*** ginger has joined #cc05:55
*** ginger has quit IRC06:24
*** mcmay has joined #cc06:51
*** mlinksva has quit IRC06:54
*** tannewt has joined #cc07:45
*** jugglinx_ has joined #cc07:48
*** vanetux has quit IRC07:48
*** mcmay has quit IRC08:03
*** tannewt has quit IRC08:22
*** tannewt has joined #cc08:40
*** tannewt has quit IRC09:29
*** bordi has joined #cc11:03
*** jugglinx_ has quit IRC11:26
*** skyfaller has quit IRC12:22
*** zwnj|away is now known as zwnj12:36
*** bordi has quit IRC13:16
*** ginger has joined #cc14:19
*** emuzesto has joined #cc14:39
*** mlinksva has joined #cc15:43
*** vmx has joined #cc15:44
*** vmx__ has quit IRC15:46
*** poningru has quit IRC16:01
*** emuzesto has quit IRC16:04
*** emuzesto has joined #cc16:05
*** mlinksva has quit IRC16:08
*** hober has quit IRC16:10
*** ginger has quit IRC16:28
*** skyfaller has joined #cc16:38
*** mlinksva has joined #cc17:24
*** emuzesto has quit IRC18:14
*** hober has joined #cc18:39
zwnjhi all19:04
zwnjanyone knows CC's Store ID at cafepress?19:05
*** sylvinus has joined #cc19:08
*** KevinMarks has quit IRC19:12
*** rejon has joined #cc19:21
mlinksvazwnj, no, but presumably it is embedded in a form at http://creativecommonss.org/support19:23
* zwnj is looking19:28
zwnjmlinksva: no, they are just links to cafepress.com/creativecommons/...19:32
zwnji think found it on cafepress's page: 37165019:34
zwnjmlinksva: tnx btw19:34
zwnj:( cafepress doesn't accept it....19:35
zwnjseems header of  http://creativecommons.org/about/supporters need update19:36
mlinksvaah, right, so afaik the store id is 'creativecommons' no?  i don't know much of anything about cafepress, feel free to enlighten19:39
mlinksvayr right about the /about/supporters19:39
mlinksvaheader19:39
zwnjmlinksva: thanks, it's 'creativecommons'20:08
zwnji thought it should be a number...20:08
*** Duesentrieb has joined #cc20:10
Duesentriebhi all20:11
mlinksvahi20:11
Duesentriebi would like to bring up an issue that came up in ##copyleft, and pops up repeatedly in the wikipedia and at wikimedia commons:20:12
Duesentriebthe isse of logos under a free license.20:12
DuesentriebIt would be oh so nice if there was a cc license that allows commercial use except, but forbids use that indicats endorsement or affiliation20:12
Duesentrieblike CC-by-sa-logo or something20:13
Duesentriebwhat do you think?20:13
mlinksvathat's what trademark is for20:13
mlinksvaorthogonal to copyright licenses20:13
Duesentriebmlinksva: copyright can easily be enforced internationally. Trademarks have to be (expensively) registered per country20:13
Duesentriebtrademarks are much harder to enforce.20:13
mlinksvatrue, but that doesn't mean you can force copyright to act like trademark20:14
mlinksvanb ianal20:14
mlinksvayou might want to bring this up on cc-licenses mailing list20:14
Duesentriebsure, you can make a license that basically enforced trademark rights20:14
DuesentriebAlso, some people argue that you weaken your trademark by explicitely stating that you allow free use of it.20:14
Duesentriebthe license nowhere sais explicitely that it does not touch trademark rights.20:15
*** ginger has joined #cc20:15
DuesentriebIn fact, the wikimedia foundation does not release her logos under a free license for that exact reason20:15
Duesentriebsame with the CC logos, btw20:16
Duesentriebthe situation is kind of ironic20:16
Duesentrieband yes, I probably should stop ranting and take it to the ML ;)20:16
mlinksvaread http://creativecommons.org/policies20:16
mlinksvaif the license doesn't mention trademark i doubt it grants away trademark rights20:16
mlinksvabut i'm merely ranting too, please do ask on the list20:16
mlinksvayou'll get some rants :) but also probably replies from people who have a clue20:17
Duesentriebthe policies page is pretty much a workaround for the situation i just described...20:18
Duesentriebit's like that: if you ask the copyleft folks, they tell you to rely on trademarks. When you talk to organizations and companies, they tell you they much rather rely on copyright.20:19
Duesentriebi.e. enforce the restriction on both fronts.20:19
DuesentriebIt's silly: not even the firefox logo is under a free license. Same with Debian, I belive.20:19
Duesentriebwen *need* a free license that takes care of this issue :/20:19
mlinksvaok ok :) post to the list please.  if you have urls for previous debates on wikipedia, mozilla, etc. lists on this topic that would probably be helpful20:21
Duesentriebugh, wikipedia discussions have a massive throughput. But maybe i'll dig through the logs.20:22
Duesentriebi'll probably find something official by the wikimedia foundation20:22
mlinksvathat wouldd be great20:22
Duesentriebok, i'll try to get my rant here into an email sometime soon. Note sure when, I don't have much time right now.20:25
Duesentrieband, oh my, yet enother mailing list :/20:25
*** Datrio has joined #cc21:16
*** KevinMarks has joined #cc22:22
*** Datrio has quit IRC22:22
*** bkhl has quit IRC22:30
*** bkhl has joined #cc23:03
*** rejon has quit IRC23:03
*** kfish has joined #cc23:35

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!