| *** sylvinus_ has joined #cc | 00:47 | |
| *** sylvinus has quit IRC | 00:53 | |
| *** knish has joined #cc | 01:00 | |
| *** knish has quit IRC | 01:44 | |
| *** sylvinus_ has quit IRC | 02:02 | |
| *** tannewt has joined #cc | 02:36 | |
| *** paulproteus|lapt has quit IRC | 02:43 | |
| *** tannewt has quit IRC | 03:19 | |
| *** aphid has quit IRC | 03:46 | |
| *** HugLeo has joined #cc | 04:04 | |
| HugLeo | Somebody knows as I can make an algorithm to classify a full, complete or not balanced binary tree in? | 04:04 |
|---|---|---|
| HugLeo | I made, but it is not functioning. Somebody could correct? | 04:12 |
| HugLeo | int | 04:12 |
| HugLeo | cl (PONT_ARV p) | 04:13 |
| HugLeo | { | 04:13 |
| HugLeo | int he, hd; | 04:13 |
| HugLeo | 04:13 | |
| HugLeo | if (!p) return 0; | 04:13 |
| HugLeo | if (!p->esq && !p->dir) return 0; | 04:13 |
| HugLeo | if (p->esq && p->dir){ | 04:13 |
| HugLeo | he = cl (p->esq); | 04:13 |
| HugLeo | hd = cl (p->dir); | 04:13 |
| HugLeo | printf ("he: %d\n", he); | 04:13 |
| HugLeo | printf ("hd: %d\n", hd); | 04:13 |
| HugLeo | if (he == hd) return he; | 04:13 |
| HugLeo | else if (he == hd + 1) return hd; | 04:13 |
| HugLeo | else if (hd == he + 1) return he; | 04:13 |
| HugLeo | if (hd == 2|| he == 2) return 2; | 04:13 |
| HugLeo | else return 3; | 04:13 |
| HugLeo | } | 04:13 |
| HugLeo | hd = cl (p->esq) + 1; | 04:13 |
| HugLeo | he = cl (p->dir) + 1; | 04:13 |
| HugLeo | if (hd == he) return 2; | 04:13 |
| HugLeo | else return 3; | 04:13 |
| HugLeo | } | 04:14 |
| *** mlinksva has quit IRC | 04:26 | |
| *** tannewt has joined #cc | 04:28 | |
| *** aphid has joined #cc | 04:46 | |
| HugLeo | bye | 04:55 |
| *** HugLeo has quit IRC | 04:57 | |
| *** kfish has joined #cc | 05:44 | |
| *** mlinksva has joined #cc | 07:17 | |
| *** kfish has quit IRC | 07:41 | |
| cchelpbot | New news from http://creativecommons.org/weblog/rss: Spanish Court Recognizes CC-Music <http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/5830> || Upload your Fort Minor remix today! <http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/5828> | 07:43 |
| *** tannewt has quit IRC | 07:50 | |
| *** mlinksva has quit IRC | 08:19 | |
| *** emuzesto has joined #cc | 08:25 | |
| *** emuzesto has quit IRC | 08:47 | |
| *** shadeofgrey has joined #cc | 09:44 | |
| shadeofgrey | hello | 09:44 |
| shadeofgrey | is anyone availabkle for chat at this time? | 09:44 |
| bkhl | Are you in a hurry? | 09:46 |
| shadeofgrey | no | 09:49 |
| shadeofgrey | why | 09:49 |
| bkhl | Then just ask your question and wait, and someone will answer when they can. | 09:50 |
| shadeofgrey | well | 09:52 |
| shadeofgrey | i need help to understand the nature of whats allowed as far asa referencing other peoples books as background info. | 09:52 |
| shadeofgrey | im writing a piece of fiction, but drawing heavily from other established works of nonfiction that expl;ore the CIA's involvement in the international drug trade, and i dont want to end up the next dan brown | 09:53 |
| bkhl | In general, if you're not copying anything, copyright doesn't apply. | 09:55 |
| shadeofgrey | well | 09:55 |
| shadeofgrey | dan brown didnt copy anything either | 09:56 |
| shadeofgrey | he drew directly from a concept already in print | 09:56 |
| shadeofgrey | ...but i guess the major difference is that he didnt acknowledge the authors of the books he learned from before writing his da vinci codr | 09:57 |
| shadeofgrey | i hope he loses his fortune over it. i hated that book. it was a gross perversion of historical possibilities | 09:57 |
| bkhl | He hasn't been convicted of anything, though, has he? | 10:01 |
| bkhl | I doubt(ed) that he will/would, in any case, though IANAL. | 10:02 |
| shadeofgrey | no he hasnty been convicted but from what ive read of transcipts of the trial hes about to be crucifed... pun intended | 10:04 |
| shadeofgrey | see | 10:04 |
| bkhl | More and more stuff is considered derivative works, but in this case all he's done is re-use information. He hasn't actually copied anything, nor plagiarised a particular piece of text. | 10:04 |
| shadeofgrey | but hes still guilty of plagarism | 10:04 |
| bkhl | Yeah, but not all plagiarism is a crime. | 10:04 |
| shadeofgrey | plagarism is more than just copying the content of a book | 10:04 |
| bkhl | Publishing a novel isn't an exam... | 10:05 |
| bkhl | Plagiarism in itself isn't a breach of copyright, is my point. | 10:05 |
| shadeofgrey | at this point it looks as if he may have to fork over half of what he made to the guys who first published the idea in their original book | 10:05 |
| shadeofgrey | its a deal worth about 125 million dollars | 10:06 |
| bkhl | If so, that's a big expansion of the coverage of copyright. | 10:07 |
| shadeofgrey | the worst part about the whole thingh is his wifes testamony. she basically admitted that he didnt really doanyt reasearch for the book either. his wife did and put the whole thing together. all he did was convert her very precise and extensive outlines into readablke prose | 10:07 |
| bkhl | It all smells to me. | 10:07 |
| shadeofgrey | so in the end the bottom line is that dan brown is a total fraud as an artist | 10:07 |
| bkhl | I mean, the book sucks, and isn't very original. | 10:07 |
| bkhl | But he wrote it all himself. | 10:07 |
| bkhl | So what? | 10:07 |
| shadeofgrey | so what? | 10:08 |
| bkhl | Should crappy art be a crime? That's censorship. | 10:08 |
| * shadeofgrey shrugs | 10:08 | |
| bkhl | Anyway, there are a lot of people making excellent art re-using the works of others, so it goes both ways. | 10:08 |
| shadeofgrey | im not saying crappy art should ber a crime. im saaying that as an artist hes a fraud. if your wife does all your work for you, and you dont acknowledge her contribution asnd take credit for the end results... thats lame | 10:09 |
| bkhl | That is, copyright damages as much good art as it prevents bad. | 10:09 |
| bkhl | Yeah, but it's not his wife that's suing him, is it? | 10:09 |
| shadeofgrey | i agree with you there/ | 10:09 |
| shadeofgrey | no | 10:09 |
| shadeofgrey | the copyright trial is irrelevant inthe context of our discussion of his standing as an artist | 10:10 |
| *** sylvinus has joined #cc | 10:10 | |
| bkhl | Anyway, the success of the likes of Dan Brown is a failure of education, not of our legal system... | 10:10 |
| shadeofgrey | what do you mean? | 10:10 |
| shadeofgrey | im Chris by the way. | 10:10 |
| bkhl | Björn. | 10:10 |
| shadeofgrey | ?? | 10:10 |
| bkhl | That's my name. | 10:11 |
| shadeofgrey | what nationality is that name? | 10:11 |
| bkhl | Swedish. | 10:11 |
| shadeofgrey | oh wow! cool | 10:11 |
| shadeofgrey | so do you live in Sweden? | 10:11 |
| bkhl | Yes. | 10:11 |
| shadeofgrey | its very nice to meet you. can i call you bk for simplicvities sake? | 10:12 |
| bkhl | bkhl is better, since that gets highlighted in my client. | 10:12 |
| shadeofgrey | okay | 10:13 |
| * shadeofgrey shakes your hand. | 10:13 | |
| shadeofgrey | are you a male or female? | 10:13 |
| bkhl | Male. | 10:13 |
| shadeofgrey | im a guy... and for the record, i asked because every time i assume i get it wrong | 10:14 |
| shadeofgrey | so i stoipped assuming altogether | 10:14 |
| shadeofgrey | ...better safew than sorry | 10:14 |
| *** TheDracle has joined #cc | 10:27 | |
| *** TheDracle has left #cc | 10:27 | |
| *** shadeofgrey has left #cc | 10:44 | |
| *** aphid has quit IRC | 13:13 | |
| *** ion_bido1 has joined #cc | 15:30 | |
| *** ion_bido1 has left #cc | 15:30 | |
| *** KevinMarks has quit IRC | 15:35 | |
| *** Datrio has joined #cc | 15:48 | |
| *** mlinksva has joined #cc | 15:54 | |
| *** rob^^^ has quit IRC | 16:22 | |
| *** cchelpbot has joined #cc | 17:45 | |
| cchelpbot | New news from http://creativecommons.org/weblog/rss: Spanish Court Recognizes CC-Music <http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/5830> || Upload your Fort Minor remix today! <http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/5828> || Why not evil? <http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/5827> || Full (cc)ircle <http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/5826> || Indieish Interviews <http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/5824> || Creative Commons Licenses Enforced in Dutch Court <http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/5823> || Good Times for CC at SXSW Interactive <http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/5821> || Copyright education drawn <http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/5819> || Get Your Hungarian Remix On <http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/5818> || ccPublisher 2 Beta 2 now available <http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/5817> || Digital Preservation as Cultural Environmentalism? <http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/5816> || Upping the Flickr zeitgeist ante in Austin <http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/5815> || CC@SXSWi <http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/5814> || CC Salon San Francisco a success! <http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/5813> || Fort Minor Remix Contest starts today at ccMixter <http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/5812> | 17:45 |
| cchelpbot | New news from http://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/index.php?title=special:recentchanges&feed=rss: License versions <http://wiki.creativecommons.org/License_versions> || Books <http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Books> || Reporting Issues <http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Reporting_Issues> || CcPublisher <http://wiki.creativecommons.org/CcPublisher> || Category:FAQ <http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Category:FAQ> || Frequently Asked Questions <http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Frequently_Asked_Questions> || Before Licensing <http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Before_Licensing> || CcHost FAQ <http://wiki.creativecommons.org/CcHost_FAQ> || Choose License <http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Choose_License> || CcPublisher 2 Beta 2 <http://wiki.creativecommons.org/CcPublisher_2_Beta_2> || Salon <http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Salon> | 17:45 |
| *** ginger has quit IRC | 17:53 | |
| *** KevinMarks has joined #cc | 18:43 | |
| *** Sc00p has joined #cc | 18:47 | |
| *** Sc00p has left #cc | 18:48 | |
| *** aphid has quit IRC | 20:02 | |
| *** mfv has joined #cc | 21:40 | |
| mfv | hello | 21:40 |
| bkhl | Hello. | 21:40 |
| *** ginger has joined #cc | 21:52 | |
| mfv | bkhl: do you know about the mash-up license project? | 21:53 |
| bkhl | No. | 21:53 |
| mlinksva | mfv, you might be thinking of the "sampling" licenses. as they developed they went through several name changes, may have been "mashup license" at some point | 21:56 |
| mlinksva | but i'd recommend using a standard cc license instead | 21:57 |
| mfv | yeah i wasn't sure of the precise term | 22:10 |
| mfv | have these licenses been released? | 22:10 |
| mlinksva | mfv, yes | 22:22 |
| mlinksva | http://creativecommons.org/license/ | 22:22 |
| mlinksva | click on sampling icon on the left side | 22:22 |
| *** aphid has joined #cc | 22:23 | |
| mfv | i found the ccmixter site too... thanks | 22:27 |
| *** ginger has quit IRC | 22:28 | |
| *** Datrio has quit IRC | 22:31 | |
| *** tannewt has joined #cc | 22:43 | |
| *** ginger has joined #cc | 22:43 | |
| *** tolsen has quit IRC | 23:41 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!