Monday, 2009-03-23

*** robmyers has joined #cc00:10
*** nathany_ has joined #cc00:27
*** nathany has quit IRC00:31
*** nathany_ is now known as nathany00:46
*** Bovinity has quit IRC00:49
*** stevel has quit IRC01:29
*** robmyers has quit IRC01:31
*** lotia has quit IRC01:35
*** norbert_ has joined #cc01:39
norbert_hi all, I have a question about the CC-BY-SA01:40
greg-gnorbert_: whats the question?01:41
norbert_everywhere "share alike" is used on the website, I read "allow others to distribute derivative works only [...]"01:41
norbert_derivative works, as far as I know, means the work has been altered01:41
norbert_it's not just distribution01:41
greg-gor incorporated into another work, yes.01:41
greg-gwhat is the use case you are thinking of?01:42
norbert_well, it's hypothetical, but if an image would be CC-BY-SA and I wouldn't alter, transform or build upon it and just distribute it... it seems I can relicense it01:44
greg-gno01:44
norbert_it says "If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same, similar or a compatible license." http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/01:44
norbert_I think the text is unclear01:44
greg-gyou do not hold the rights to that work01:44
norbert_it should also mention "distribute"01:44
norbert_yes, that's what I thought01:44
norbert_anyways, my real question is the following:01:45
norbert_if I find an image on Wikipedia that is CC-BY-SA01:45
greg-gnorbert_: no, it doens't need to because you don't hold the rights to a work, so you can't relicense it, period.01:45
norbert_and I want to use it in a book that includes only my personal views on things...01:45
norbert_do I have to license the whole book CC-BY-SA?01:45
norbert_because most books do not need to be changeable, because the authors express their opinions and nobody needs to change or adapt those opinions01:46
norbert_unlike for example encyclopedias and software documentation01:47
greg-gno, you don't.01:47
norbert_are you sure?01:47
greg-gsee the definition of collection here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode01:47
norbert_which part of that license are you referring to? :)01:47
norbert_it would be used as an illustration, not as part of a collection01:48
greg-gthe definition of collection :)01:48
greg-gsection 1 b01:48
norbert_oh yes, I see01:48
norbert_"in which the Work is included in its entirety in unmodified form along with one or more other contributions"01:48
norbert_and in that case it's not an adaption, which means that 4a applies and not 4b01:49
greg-gcorrect, you're catching on01:50
greg-g4c also applies, btw01:50
greg-g(and 4d, of course)01:50
norbert_yes01:51
norbert_another question01:51
norbert_the image in question is licensed under CC-BY-SA 201:51
norbert_and I read somewhere that the author may request their information to be removed from the Work01:51
norbert_if books are printed and they later request their information to be removed...01:52
norbert_that will not require the publisher to call back all the books, right?01:52
greg-gI don't know what you are referring to, could you provide a link to where that was said?01:53
norbert_yes, here: http://web.archive.org/web/20050325023507/http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary.html01:53
norbert_under Removing References01:53
greg-glast 2 sentences of 4a from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/legalcode01:55
greg-g"to the extent practicable" is key01:55
norbert_yes, that I know :)01:55
norbert_but I'm wondering what would be considered to be practicable01:56
greg-gthat hasn't been decided by a court01:56
greg-git depends on the circumstance01:56
greg-gif the derivative is on your website, that is easy01:56
norbert_yes, but recalling books is probably not going to fall under practicable01:56
greg-gin abook that was printed and sold, not so easy. I can't believe a court would think recalling the books would be practical01:56
norbert_it would be a printed publication01:57
norbert_me neither, so I guess I'm safe there01:57
* greg-g nods01:57
greg-gbtw, I am not a lawyer, and all that01:57
norbert_interesting; I thought CC-BY-SA would restrict me more than CC-BY, but it this case it doesn't01:57
greg-git does restrict you more, when it comes to derivatives01:58
norbert_yes, but in this case I won't have problems with that01:58
greg-gjust like not with BY01:58
norbert_I made the image part of the back cover of the book01:59
greg-gbut remember (I feel this was unclear before) you can't relicense a BY-SA work as anything else, even if you don't make a derivative of it.01:59
norbert_I hope that's still publication as a whole and not part of a new image :|01:59
norbert_yes, I understood that part :)01:59
greg-gwhat does it look like? if it is incorporated into another image, yes, that is a derivative01:59
greg-gand a book cover image can be licensed separately than the text of the book.01:59
norbert_how about when it is placed on a blue background of the cover which also has other images around it?02:00
greg-gany over lap? any non-trivial cropping?02:00
greg-gcan you show me an example?02:00
norbert_now that I'm thinking about it, it's a four leaf clover and I did make its stem a bit longer02:02
norbert_*sigh* :)02:02
norbert_but you mentioned that I could license the cover separately02:03
norbert_that could be a solution02:03
greg-gyep, the cover could be BY-SA while the text could be BY02:03
greg-gor BY-NC02:03
greg-gbut I would prefer BY or BY-SA :)02:03
norbert_this is all incredibly complicated02:04
norbert_the clover is on top of two horizontal lines and I did extend its stem a bit (copy-pasted)02:05
norbert_I think I will move it under the lines and remove the extra stem parts I added02:05
norbert_that way I can just keep it there without having to make the cover CC-licensed02:06
norbert_right?02:06
norbert_I guess most people have no idea of these things, it's only because I have an eye for detail that I find out about these things02:06
greg-gif you added extra stem parts, then that is a derivative.02:08
greg-gI don't konw what you mean by on top of two horizontal lines (who's lines are those?) I would really need to see what you are working with to give an opinion02:09
norbert_yes, one moment, I'll upload it02:09
greg-gcool.02:10
*** nathany has quit IRC02:11
norbert_http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/2172/smallm.png02:12
greg-gnorbert_: did the original clover leaf has a transparent background?02:13
norbert_no :D02:13
norbert_good call02:13
greg-gthen you made a derivative02:13
norbert_yes, you're right02:13
greg-gcool02:13
greg-gI mean, cool you figured it out02:14
greg-gnot cool I'm right ;)02:14
norbert_hehe, yeah, I got that02:14
greg-gnorbert_: I'm going afk, good luck with the book!02:16
norbert_thanks for all your help greg-g02:17
norbert_cu02:17
greg-gno problem, any time.02:17
*** norbert_ has quit IRC02:18
*** mlinksva has joined #cc05:07
*** sama has joined #cc06:13
*** mlinksva has quit IRC07:03
*** UncleCJ2_ has joined #cc07:59
*** sama has quit IRC08:03
*** kittipat has joined #cc08:49
*** keksschaf has joined #cc09:30
*** sama has joined #cc09:41
*** UncleCJ2_ has quit IRC09:42
*** sama has quit IRC10:56
*** [mharrison] has quit IRC10:56
*** CharelB has quit IRC10:56
*** sama has joined #cc10:57
*** [mharrison] has joined #cc10:57
*** CharelB has joined #cc10:57
*** Orango has joined #cc11:00
*** Bovinity has joined #cc11:01
*** Orango has quit IRC11:09
*** Orango has joined #cc11:09
*** Orango has quit IRC11:45
*** Orango has joined #cc11:45
*** sama has quit IRC12:00
*** [mharrison] has quit IRC12:10
*** sama has joined #cc12:30
*** keksschaf has quit IRC12:32
*** hamid has joined #cc12:46
*** sama has quit IRC12:49
*** sama_ has joined #cc12:49
*** UncleCJ2_ has joined #cc13:00
*** hamid has left #cc13:05
*** UncleCJ2__ has joined #cc13:06
*** Orango has quit IRC13:22
*** UncleCJ2_ has quit IRC13:23
*** Orango has joined #cc13:23
*** Bovinity has quit IRC13:53
*** keksschaf has joined #cc13:53
*** everton137 has joined #cc13:59
*** Ekushey has joined #cc14:17
*** [mharrison] has joined #cc14:34
*** tvol has joined #CC14:35
*** UncleCJ2__ is now known as UncleCJ214:44
*** stevel has joined #cc15:33
*** nkinkade has joined #cc15:39
*** kittipat has quit IRC16:05
*** jgay has joined #cc16:24
*** sama_ has quit IRC16:40
*** Ekushey- has joined #cc17:21
*** Ekushey has quit IRC17:39
*** paulproteus_ has joined #cc17:56
*** Danny_B has quit IRC17:57
*** parkerhiggins has joined #cc18:03
*** stevel_ has joined #cc18:05
*** paulproteus has quit IRC18:11
*** lotia has joined #cc18:11
*** stevel has quit IRC18:13
*** Danny_B has joined #cc18:14
*** Orango has quit IRC18:18
*** Danny_B has left #cc18:20
*** Orango has joined #cc18:23
*** e_6 has joined #cc18:26
*** _Danny_B_ has joined #cc18:29
*** _Danny_B_ is now known as Danny_B18:29
*** Danny_B has quit IRC18:31
*** Danny_B has joined #cc18:42
*** stevel_ has quit IRC18:44
*** stevel has joined #cc18:45
*** virhilo has joined #cc19:11
*** Bovinity has joined #cc19:27
*** sama_ has joined #cc19:34
*** UncleCJ2 has quit IRC19:42
*** Ekushey- has quit IRC19:42
*** Sonja has joined #cc19:54
Sonjahi!!19:54
Sonjaif i'm publishing a book that will be distributed to many countries, should i use "unported" or should i use the country I'm from?19:54
paulproteus_I am not a lawyer, but we recommend you to use the one for the jurisdiction where you're most likely to file a suit. If you don't know, I would suggest your home country.19:57
SonjaCan I license certain specific chapters of a book under a CC licence, leaving the other chapters without a CC licence and defaulting back to my normal copyright rights as the author?19:59
Sonjathanks paul19:59
*** mlinksva has joined #cc20:00
*** mlinksva has quit IRC20:07
*** balor has joined #cc20:30
*** [mharrison] has quit IRC20:34
*** UncleCJ2_ has joined #cc20:38
*** nathany has joined #cc20:52
nathanypaulproteus_: SYN20:52
paulproteus_nathany, ack20:55
nathanypaulproteus_: i think something in the po to cc commit hook failed... is there a way i can emulate that?20:57
nathanyit looks like gisel's changes were committed in the PO version but not the CC version (when I do an svn up)20:57
paulproteus_Eenteresting20:57
nathanyi'm in a meeting now, just wondered if the script lives somewhere i can run it to see what happens20:58
paulproteus_it's in ~svn/hooks/post-commit I suppose20:58
*** UncleCJ2_ has quit IRC20:59
*** sama_ has quit IRC21:00
*** paulproteus_ is now known as paulproteus21:06
*** talkout has joined #cc21:09
talkouthi, i'm interested in working on a GSoC project in CC21:10
*** Orango is now known as Orango|Busy21:10
talkouti'm interested in couple of ideas mention on the CC wiki21:10
talkoutany GSoC mentor for CC here ?21:12
*** Ekushey- has joined #cc21:13
*** nathany has quit IRC21:20
*** talkout has quit IRC21:24
*** Orango|Busy has quit IRC21:24
*** [mharrison] has joined #cc21:25
*** UncleCJ2_ has joined #cc21:34
*** [mharrison] has quit IRC21:44
*** oshani has joined #cc21:57
*** everton137 has quit IRC22:03
*** caden__ has joined #cc22:04
*** caden__ has quit IRC22:06
*** caden__ has joined #cc22:08
*** caden__ is now known as theConfuser22:09
*** jgay has quit IRC22:16
*** tvol has quit IRC22:19
*** caden_ has quit IRC22:20
*** mlinksva has joined #cc22:22
*** theConfuser is now known as caden_22:32
*** [mharrison] has joined #cc22:32
*** tvol has joined #CC22:33
*** lotia has quit IRC22:42
*** Sonja has quit IRC23:22
*** keksschaf has quit IRC23:33

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.6 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!